number one reason thirteen year olds don't belong at raves...

i havent forgotten ^.^
lol..

In essence, the government is a form of control.

Definition: the political direction and control exercised over the actions of the members, citizens, or inhabitants of communities, societies, and states; direction of the affairs of a state, community, etc.; political administration: Government is necessary to the existence of civilized society.

Look, we're quite fucking capable of using a dictionary ourselves.

Who the fuck are you to come in here asking for the thread to be deleted?

The user that posted this comment has been banned from DontStayIn. To view the message, click here at your own risk.

And Stumblez, It's PLEEEEEASE, not PLEASEEEEE

Again, another thick fucking American Hill Billy.

What point? That you're an arrogant prick that's talking crap on someone thousands of miles away that you'll never meet in your lifetime and calling them a paedophile based off of what they're wearing?

I totally wish I was as smart as you are!!


Yeah, I have time to waste cause I'm trying to figure out something else to add to my projects I have. What's your excuse?


I'm against all-ages events thrown around known child sex offenders, and thrown only for the reason of making money. So yeah, most events in AZ I am against.


I'm pointing out your fallacious logic you twit. Maybe if you weren't such an ill-logical retard, I wouldn't be pointing out your fallacies.


Throw around big fancy words? Okay, so because I have an elaborate vocabulary and understand the English language and its root words, and the meanings of words, means I'm not 'intelligent' as I think I am, because you said so? I love your Logical Fallacies, they crack me up.

So you're telling me that its wrong to compare intelligence and point out how retarded some people's children are based upon their abilities of thinking and reason? Okay, sorry I hurt your feelings. I won't stop :D

Lol @ Wikipedia tab and Dictionary. Sorry that I'm not an idiot that has to run to Wikipedia (which is one of the most awful sources to use anyways and isn't that reliable and cannot be used in an education setting as a reliable source) and run to a dictionary to find out terms they I don't understand. I guess it was a bad idea for my parents to raise me up to be a free-thinker and not some retarded idiot who has everyone else tell them how to think and what to think.

I think you'll find that Dez's comment was sarcastic humour.

look you blurt, the language you speak is English, not American. You butes can't even spell colour properly.

A paedophile is someone who interferes with underage kids. If that means 18 in some of your states then fine, have a biscuit.

As for logic and reason, what do you propose was this wierdos logic and reason was when he decided to visit the shops and spend his money on a variety of childrens toys to make into a piece of clothing? What would you say if Michael Jackson would have worn it?

If you had kids, would you let your mate look after them in his fucking care bare waistcoat?

PS. You're still a twat.

waaaahaaaaaaaaa

maybe in your little retard class in your backwards American state you come across as having an 'elaborate vocabulary' but do us a favour mate, I've read your posts and you're thick as fuck.

Maybe its time to tone down the modesty a little?

ha ha ha ha you fools in the states wouldnt know a decent rave if it jumped up and bit you on the arse!!! Just the fact that you have mixed raves with underage kids and adults proves it!!! Do any of you americans actually know what REAL hardcore is??? Please. How can you take the piss out of the UK when you still dont know what a decent rave is. Tell you what, come over here on holiday and come to one, you would shit your pants!!! Take the piss out of us and we bite back!!! Im sure youve noticed that by now!!

Hmm.... this thread has been very entertaining but i findly slightly disturbing that you americans can't seem to just think for one minute...

You allow underage minors and kids in your raves (which is wrong and a completely different subject) who run around wearing tape over their nipples and skimpy little knickers ... so if you were a peadophile where would you go? I know - they would dress up in some stupid care bear outfit to lure in young girls and offer 'free hugs'. It's peadophile heaven.

Just because you spoke to him at a rave doesn't mean he isn't cumming in his pants everytime some prepubescent little girl runs around squeeling and shouting in their underwear and then taking up his offer of 'free hugs'.

I hope he isn't a peadophile - it's the lowest of the low - but for fuck sake just think about it! Would you want some old man dressed as a care bear giving your child free hugs at a rave or would you be slightly concerned as to why an ADULT - A GROWN MAN is wearing clothing that would appeal to young girls.

Fucking hell did you not read it? Americans seem to use the word arrogant and ignorant alot and this is what i posted on an earlier comment...You then went on to put those words 4 or 5 times in your last comment. Get it now?
Still nothing to come out with.


I totally wish i could read as good as you...
Anyways, i will say it again, the whole peado thing is a joke. A humour you've already admitted you don't get. Fuck you take things too seriously. You've read too many logic and reason books i think.


What, by coming on here and trying to come of as smart? Yeah right. My excuse is that i do have time to waste like everybody does, so i waste some of it on here. Simple.


Again, you're proving that you're not smart, don't read things properly and obviously you really don't understand sarcasm at all. Seems like i am actually pointing out your fallacies, as you're in fact, an ill-logical twat. And still a dull one at that.


Ok maybe i should've said the same old fancy words that always seem to crop up in your comments. Your vocabulary isn't that big. Logic, reason, ill-logical, fallacies, arrogant and ignorant seem to be the only words you use to try and insult. Still, it doesn't work. And yes, i do think so.


Be my guest and carry on by all means. You seem to make up your mind who is an un-educated retard based on their opinions anyways. If you don't agree with someones comment, you seem to try and 'point out their ill-logical fallacies' all the time. Getting old now. But do carry on if it makes you feel really that superior when it comes to intelligence. But as for
Like i said before, if you care to read properly this time,
Still stands.


Good for you. I'm glad that you're a free thinker. You're the only one on this thread who hasn't followed us bunch of sheep in giving some idiotic twat some humourous abuse for a laugh. Oh wait, no you're not. You also think alike the other 'it's not funny' cunts who have also shared their opinions by calling us, basically, un-educated retards on this thread too. Sorry to break it to you man. I bet you thought it was great being an intelligent caped crusade who stood out from the rest. Glad to hear you don't use wikipedia or a dictionary though.

AIDZ

<3

Noooooo, you think? Are you retarded as well? I know I speak English you fucking idiot, and Americans like to change the spelling of words. Doesn't mean anything you self-righteous fucktard.

There you go again, with believing what you're told. If you had any brains and would go research words and their meanings, you wouldn't make retarded claims like you just did. Since you're too inane, I'll do it for you:

pe·do·phil·i·a
–noun Psychiatry.
sexual desire in an adult for a child.

pe·do·phile
–noun Psychiatry.
an adult who is sexually attracted to young children.

child (child)
n. pl. chil·dren (chil'dr?n)
1. A person between birth and puberty.

So yeah, lemme tell you. A paedophile totally is exactly what you said even when the dictionary terms that are easily accessible are going against your definition.

I guess science must be wrong, because you say it is.

Why should I even respond to your fallacious logic? I don't know the person personally, so I have no room to judge a person, based off of their fucking attire. People who personally know him, have came in and expressed how you guys thinking he let minors hug him and he wore that to get attention from minors, are fucking retarded. They've given different cases of how that is not true. But you know, since you guys think something, it must be true!!!!!!

P.S. You're still a fucking idiot.


I'm thick as fuck because I understand Psychology and can use the language you speak, better than you can?

Great! Glad to know I'm thicker than you because I'm in here calling everyone whose being fucking idiots, fucking idiots.

Haven't you noticed? I'm simply here to point out how you, and everyone else that calls him a paedophile based off of just looking at his attire; is a fucking retard. But of course! Since you think something, its automatically true!!!

Fuck the science behind it all, fuck the definitions behind it all, he's a paedophile! He's a paedophile because we say so!!!! He's wearing brightly coloured bears and a free hug t-shirt, he is a paedophile because we say so!!!!

You guys are fucking idiots.


Actually, maybe the kids in Arizona don't know a decent rave, because I've been to 'decent' (which is all perception and subjective anyways) raves outside of Arizona, there actually was one on Halloween.

How does that prove it? Seems like you're just trying to grab at anything you think you can argue, and go with it. Where is your proof that your claims 'prove' what you're arguing?

You mean that simplistic music with no bassline, that sounds like organised noise and distortion where people hop around like rabbits while pumping their fist in the air??

Again 'decent' is a perception, and also subjective, just as is the music every person enjoys. So 'decent' to you, could be shit to someone else, and visa versa. Again, to reiterate: Arizona kids probably don't know what a decent event is (there are the occasional few in Arizona, like Harmonic Concordance 3, Disctropolis and Ritual) so, you're probably right, if you're talking to the Arizona kids.

UK doesn't have raves...Lots of the UKers have even stated such. They're 'club events'. If you want to get technical, even the UK people haven't seen a rave since the early 90s... At least what I've been told by UKers who have been into EDM since its beginnings. I'd shit my pants at a Netherlands party, no doubt about it! But a UK club event? Probably not.

And the same goes with Americans. Take the piss out of us, and we bite back too.

We use Gorilla Warfare, too ;D


You're right, MOST Americans can't think. I've always been against All-ages events because 12-15 year olds don't belong there. I'm also mainly against 16+ if its not at a properly secure venue, and doesn't have the proper authorities there and in check. If it is? More power to the promoter I suppose. That's a liability I wouldn't want as a promoter, and won't spend my money supporting events such as those, either. I've always been vocal about 18+ because minors don't have a place around raves (in my opinion) due to the fact of rampant drug use and many perverted adults who like to take advantage of people, and its easy to take advantage of a minor.

So, don't try to generalise us all plz? In my honest opinion, I feel that the majority of promoters who only throw all-ages events, do it for the money. Again, this is an opinion, not stating its fact....But it does seem kind of suspicious that promoters would start to flyer to middle and high-schools to get higher numbers at their events..


I'm going to have to call bullshit on the dressing up in some care bear outfit and offering free hugs being a paedophile, for the simple fact that the manager of one of the event centers (which is now closed due to that reason) who is a known, convicted sex offender who raped a 3 year old and made her piss on his junk, didn't dress up in colourful attire at these events...

And you're absolutely correct. Which is another reason I'm against all-ages events: Adolescents don't belong at Raves due to the rampant drug use and abuse and the adults who are there to take advantage of druged up people.


And if you read, he rejected giving hugs to minors. True paedophiles, wouldn't do that, they'd be down for it.

No, I wouldn't. I wouldn't want some 30+ year old dressed in shit that attracts children. But this guy looks to be around my age: 22. That is hardly an 'old man' ;P

What makes you think he wore the colourful bears to attract young girls? Have you ever taken any Psychoactive of any type before? Psychoactives make colours more vivid....Which is why hippies in the 60s wore tie-dye (that shit looks amazing on Hallucinogens)...Maybe he wore it to trip people out who are on Psychoactive drugs?

He's wearing a black shirt and dark pants. Wearing colourful bears. Maybe, due to the contrast of colours, he did that so people on drugs would see these bright things just walking around (because warehouses can get pretty damn dark..At least the ones I used to go to back in 06-07) and get tripped out from that??

Not saying that's why, but just giving a different perspective to the possible reason of the colourful bears.


I read it, but you have no point. I don't call you arrogant or ignorant because I can't think of anything else, I call you those things BECAUSE YOU ARE THOSE THINGS.

Get the point yet? Oh, maybe if I don't use such 'big words' you'll be able to understand it. Here, I'll dumb it down for you:

You're an asshole who is stupid. There, I dumbed it down for you instead of using the words arrogant and ignorant, I put it into lamen terms. Happy yet? Or are you still going to be just as self-righteous as Kaiser-Sosef and think that you're better than everyone else because you're from the UK?

Typical UK attitude from arrogant and ignorant fucks.


Yeah, its my bad that I don't get how calling someone a paedophile is humorous when that shit can put people away into prison, just off of hearsay (in lamen terms for you idiots: rumours) here in the states, and not off of truth and facts of the situation.

Go call someone a paedophile to your authorities and point them out, and see what they do, and see if its humorous.


Trying to come off as smart? Sorry, I am smart and that I just like to poke fun at people who provide situations to make them look like absolute retards. Its pretty fun, you should try it. I suggest you start with the original poster ;)


Again, I'm smart. I'm pointing out that its fallacious logic. Regardless if you want to try to run it off as 'humour' its still ill-logical bullshit. I read things properly, but you're making assumptions that I didn't, based off the fact I have ignored your 'humour' and have went after the thinking behind the humour. But you know, if you were as smart as you state you are, you'd understand that.

You're right. I can't understand sarcasm.... At least not on an EMOTIONLESS TEXT MEDIUM you twit. Got me good there dood!!!!! Moron.

You're actually pointing out the fact you're still an idiot, regardless if you want to play the entire thread off as 'humour' because of the mad amounts of assumptions you're making based off of someone's attire, and how you've ignored (at least, not responded to) definitions of the word you UK twits are throwing around a lot.

Great intellect you got going on there!!


Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis.


Nah. Just idiots who try to run off of 'humour' when it comes to things that can send people away to prison for years and years.


Actually, being a free-thinker is having the ability to think of things yourself. When the dumb cunt who made this thread did it, I thought to myself (being a free-thinker and all) that it was entirely fucked up shit for the dumb bitch to do that because I know people who have been put away in prison for having consensual sex. But you know, because these people are friends of the person and defending him, and I'm going at it from the perspective that the fact that its bullshit to accuse someone of fucked up shit like that, I totally must be following them in their footsteps.

Got me good there dood!
Jared has Aidz, what?

I get what your saying Kellimus but there is just something not quite right with a grown man wearing something like that. I'm all for bright colours (you won't see me not cybered up for a rave) but i feel there is something about the psychology as to why he would choose something like that to wear to a rave.

Whilst the UK and USA have different looks we both share liking to dress up in bright colours and in what we call over here Cyber - but there is something sinister about the way he has dressed up. I hope he really is innocent but if that is the case then he needs to see how outsiders may view it.

Just give over mate. You're not going to win, you're American.

oooh ohhh, I want to bash the Britts too! Yer food is bland. ha, take that.

Coming from a man who lives in a country that feeds on fast food?